Infinto · Skills diagnostics & practice · Singapore

Your skills decay.
We don't stop building.

Every skill you have is being re-priced. Infinto measures which parts of your work AI now does outright, which parts you'll be paid to supervise, and which parts compound — then keeps building the third kind, for as long as the ground keeps moving.

Skill half-life index rev. Jul 2026
Composition of a working day half-life 2.4 yrs
  • Done by the modelReconciliation, variance tables, first-pass commentary. 46%
  • You supervise itChecking assumptions, catching the plausible-but-wrong. 31%
  • Compounds with youDeciding what to measure and defending it to a board. 23%

Half-life is how long before half of today's task list moves left. These figures are an illustrative model, not measured data — see how we derive them. Your audit uses your own task log.

First half — your skills decay

Nobody loses a whole job. They lose a column.

Skills don't disappear on a schedule — they get hollowed out from the inside. The routine middle of a craft goes first, quietly, while the title stays the same. What's left is thinner and harder: framing the problem, judging output you didn't produce, carrying responsibility for a decision a model can't be accountable for.

We say this plainly because most providers won't. A half-life of 2.4 years is not a marketing number — it's the reason a certificate earned this year is worth less next year, and worth arguing about now.

How the three columns are scored →

Second half — we don't stop building

Decay is the premise. Building is the product.

A course ends. Decay doesn't. So the useful thing isn't a qualification that dates — it's a standing relationship with the question, re-run as often as the ground moves under you.

Infinto re-audits your work each quarter, because a band measured last March describes a job that no longer exists. Every re-audit produces a new starting point and a new track. Nobody graduates, and that's the point: the skills are finite, the building isn't.

See what gets built →

How it works

Three weeks to a defensible plan. Then it repeats.

Week one — Audit

Map your actual tasks

You log a fortnight of real work, or connect a calendar and ticket queue. Each task is scored against what current models do unassisted. Output: your band, not a persona's.

Week two — Drill

Practice on live problems

Graded exercises in the compounding column: judging model output under time pressure, specifying work, spotting confident errors in your own domain. Reviewed by a practitioner.

Week three — Proof

Ship something you can show

You finish with a worked artifact and a scored record of the judgment calls behind it — the evidence a certificate was never able to give a hiring manager.

Each quarter — Again

Re-run it, because the ground moved

A new audit against current model capability, a new band, a new track. You can see what held its value and what didn't. This is the part that doesn't end.

Tracks

Six starts, built on the compounding column.

For organisations

Find out where the capability actually sits.

Run the audit across a function and you get a coverage map instead of a completion rate: which judgment your team can back, and where one person is the entire safety net.

Start

Your skills decay. Start building before the next re-price.

The audit is free, takes about four minutes, and nothing is stored. It's the first of many — that's the whole idea.